Review: Comparing Scans on the FlipPal and Epson V500
Friday, March 11, 2011 I've been immersed in family photos recently and spending a lot of time with my Epson V500 flatbed scanner when it occurred to me that I could move my scanning station to a more congenial location with my new little FlipPal mobile scanner. Right now I am scanning lots of old black and white snapshots from the 1930's to the 1960's. I don't need the additional size of the Epson flatbed, the FlipPal 4x6 window would be adequate.
Before I got too excited about scanning while viewing tv reruns and the upcoming baseball season, I thought I would run a few tests to see how the final scans compare.
I am not trying to scan every photo in my collection; instead I have selected milestone images that I want to use as headshots in my genealogy database and as illustrations in a family history book. I have identified some images that need restoration work, but most photos will get only a bit of auto-adjusting and cropping.
My typical scanner settings on the Epson V500 for this type of job are
Image Type: 24-bit color
Resolution: 600 dpi
Target Size: original
I usually scan as TIF files, but for this test, I scanned as JPG to more closely match the available FlipPal format.
For this comparison I did not activate any of the Epson restoration options.
The FlipPal Mobile Scanner offers only two options: 300 or 600 scanning resolution. I chose 600 dpi. All files are saved as jpg.
I imported both files to Adobe Lightroom3 and cropped the images. This is necessary with the FlipPal because the scanner always scans the entire 4x6 screen. Both images were exported as full-size jpgs.
I've reduced the images here to a maximum 100K for web versions, but you can still get an idea of the image quality and color.
Epson Scan -- jpg, 1.1MB, 1571 x 1257
FlipPal Scan -- jpg, 983KB, 1474 x 1179
My imperfect cropping showed up in the two slightly different file sizes, but overall the images were pretty close. The difference, however, shows up in the scan color. The FlipPal doesn't really have an option to select color, and overall the image has a purple-ish cast. It isn't too bad and can be easily adjusted. The Epson scan, is very close to the original Kodak print with that old-fashioned black and white tone.
My choice? The FlipPal does a good job, and I would certainly be happy to scan these images from a relative or on a research trip; but at home, it's easier overall to let the Epson flatbed crop in the Preview screen and save me from any later color adjustments. As a premium, the Epson will even let me scan multiple images at one time, a real time-saver.
You May Also Like --
More comparisons of the FlipPal Mobile Scanner and the Epson V500 here.
Reader Comments (5)
I'm glad you did comparison scans. I hadn't thought to try that approach but I will now.
That was my take as well. Waiting for my Flip Pal to get here, but I would do all my "at home" scanning on my V500, but the Flip Pal seems more than adequate for "field work." And like you say, the slight color cast can easily be dealt with later. I should go check the porch and see if it got here yet! :-)
Thank you a million times over for doing this comparison. I'll stick with my Canon LIDE200 flatbed for travel. It is the same size as a17" notebook, and runs off the USB power from my notebook so no extra cords. Not as convenient as a Flip Pal but a better performer, especially on texts (no need to stitch documents together).
I like the portability of the FlipPal, but at home, it's hard to beat a full size flatbed.
Thanks for stopping by!
It would be interesting to see a comparison of a tif scan and a jpg scan after it's been edited and re-saved once or twice. I think that's really where the competition lies rather than between two scanners doing jpg's which is irrelevant anyway when you're doing archival work. The resolution shown above looks better to me in the first photo scanned by your flatbed.